Everything You Believe is Wrong!
Why Beliefs Are Obstacles to Truth

Richard Rose was a vehement proponent of investigating and understanding the corruption of government and all its functionaries—judges, politicians, bureaucrats, crooked cops and office holders at every level—and he was uncompromising in his insistence on truth, from the most trivial aspects of daily life, to the highest spiritual Truth. His teachings in this regard are more relevant today than ever, and in fact, may be the key to restoring sanity to this insane world. He was also a vigorous opponent of belief at every level, maintaining that belief was the main obstacle to the discovery of Absolute Truth.

In the April 2022 TAT Forum, in the "Inspiration and Irritation" section, there was a reference in an article about "Conspirituality," which included the following excerpt from Wikipedia:

It [Conspirituality] offers a broad politico-spiritual philosophy based on two core convictions, the first traditional to conspiracy theory, the second rooted in the New Age: 1) a secret group covertly controls, or is trying to control, the political and social order, and 2) humanity is undergoing a ‘paradigm shift’ in consciousness. Proponents believe that the best strategy for dealing with the threat of a totalitarian ‘new world order’ is to act in accordance with an awakened ‘new paradigm’ worldview.

This article, "Everything You Believe is Wrong!," is intended to offer a counter-point—a counter-irritation, perhaps—to the article referenced in that TAT Forum, and to those who still claim such happenings are "conspiracy theories" by invalidating everyday beliefs that make up the basis for such claims. These beliefs—including unknown, subconscious beliefs—form the basis of our psyche, or mind, and are obstacles to knowing ourselves if they are still unknown or unconscious to us.

The term coined as "conspirituality" may be an attempt to discredit anyone suspicious of the motives of the New World Order (NWO)¹, and to discourage the objective investigation of its anti-human, anti-spiritual agenda, which it labels and sells as "The Great Reset," "The Fourth Industrial Revolution," "Sustainable Development," or simply the UN "Global Goals."² By coining a term that links "spirituality" with "conspiracy," those in control of the narrative are attempting to discredit people who speak about relative truth in conjunction with spiritual truth.

Hopefully this article will offer a glimpse of relative, worldly truth to folks who are beginning to suspect that, truly, nothing is what it seems in this world, and that corporate media sources—including Wikipedia and all TV network news—which label everything that doesn’t conform to the official government narrative a "conspiracy theory," may in fact be controlled by people who, to say the least, do not have our best interests at heart.

In these times, when yesterday’s conspiracy theory quickly becomes today’s conspiracy fact, more and more people are beginning to see through the veil of lies being hammered into us daily by corporate media. This article is an entreaty to resist the pervasive "programming" we are being subjected to, and to, as Richard Rose advised, DOUBT EVERYTHING.

***

In both Isis Unveiled³ by H.P. Blavatsky and The Albigen Papers⁴) by Richard Rose, nearly half of the book—the first half to be precise—is dedicated to countering the current belief system of the reader which they both saw as the primary obstacle to spiritual progress. Reality of the relative kind is mostly "agreement," and when something disagrees with the commonly accepted reality, the reality itself will fight back to maintain its inertia. It takes a lot of questioning and a persistent, rigorous self-honesty—which is a spiritual seeker’s most reliable tool on the path to Truth—to overcome this inertia and to see reality as it is without the filter of belief.

This requires a discriminating, doubting, questioning mind that must be self-directed. It cannot be obedient to outside influences. The spiritual path to self-discovery includes, among other things, learning to think for yourself—apart from the crowd, outside the box, free from commonly accepted, socially-acceptable beliefs.

Forty years ago there were over 1500 independent media outlets—newspapers, magazines, radio stations, local TV stations, TV networks, cable channels, movie studios, and entertainment companies. Now, they have all been acquired by 6 mega-corporations⁵ that all deliver the same programming, in lockstep with one another, that is virtually the exact same wording. Every news outlet now sounds exactly alike. No wonder critical-thinking, intuitive souls have come to realize that these media outlets can no longer be considered either "news" or reliable sources.⁶

It wasn't always this way. Even prior to 2012 there was some journalistic integrity for reporting the news even if it was mostly negative news. In 2012 though, through a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the repeal of the propaganda ban from the Smith-Mundt Act Of 1948⁷ was lifted, paving the way for the U.S. to spread domestic propaganda delivered from our very own government—information weaponized against its own people.

In conjunction with this coordinated propaganda onslaught is a parallel effort to censor and silence all views and evidence that does not conform to the official narrative. Independent journalists, scientists, doctors, and researchers of all sorts are de-platformed, censored, slandered, persecuted, "fact-checked" by government-funded lackeys, and labeled conspiracy theorists—a term made up in the 1960s in an effort to dismiss those who did not accept the official story of President John F. Kennedy’s murder, which has since been proven to indeed have been a NWO conspiracy.⁸

The mega-corporations that own these reporting outlets wield this many-headed monster to shape public opinion, and even influence what "science" we must believe—which is an ever-changing landscape of shifting sands. Are eggs good for you today? Tomorrow a new study will tell you they’re bad for you. Are eggs bad for you today? Tomorrow a new study will reveal they’re good for you. As the joke goes, "A new scientific study reveals that the results of scientific studies depend entirely on who is funding the study." Yes, even science which follows the Scientific Method can be corrupted simply by controlling which studies (results) are released and denouncing authors of studies with results that are unfavorable to the chosen narrative. "Following the money" is a great way to find phony "science" and is one way of questioning everything.

Science, even with its brilliant achievements, has also been twisted into a weapon against the psyche of man for the purpose of pushing political and globalist aims—aims that go against what it means to be human, aims that are in fact open warfare on a spiritual level well beyond material "reality." This has never been more apparent that in the last few years.

Don’t misunderstand, science remains a viable paradigm for research, and we should incorporate the scientific method into our lives and thinking, especially when it comes to the spiritual search. But we need to recognize science isn’t the sole domain of those with credentials from government-supported universities and institutions, or those who merely echo the mockingbirds on corporate news. If we ever hope to get at the truth of things, we need to scientifically and objectively examine evidence from ALL sources, including, and maybe especially, those sources that have been censored for being outside the current paradigm, or disagreeing with official policy.

If evidence is not examined, not even looked at, it will not be seen. The mind will sense a threat to its existing worldview before the "I" that claims it is even aware in the moment—though it may be aware after the fact. Then it "turns away" and does not see what it was afraid of. Yet those who have seen this mechanism in play know there is nothing to fear, and that other paradigms or worldviews have equal or greater validity to existing, commonly-accepted or socially-acceptable worldviews. Conspiracy is not theory when it is the truth of what is actually happening.

Yet we have a whole system of denial, mockery and misinformation called "fact checking" that attempts to discredit, discourage, or deny evidence and call it misinformation (or disinformation). These so-called "fact checkers" that have sprung up recently like mushrooms on dung in the dark, are quick to censor any evidence against official positions, calling it "untrusted," "lacking context," or "partially false"—anything to cast dispersion upon independent voices and quash critical thinking. Ad hominem (against the person) attacks are also used to discredit independent authors and researchers in an attempt to keep people from reading and listening to them. Gaslighting is another important tool of the propagandists—telling us to not even believe what we see with our own eyes, but to believe their approved version of what we are seeing. So much effort and so many tactics to keep us duped and confused. What are they afraid of us knowing? What do they fear we will find out? Inquiring minds want to know.

A good rule of thumb for sincere truth-seekers is to carefully examine anything being censored and discredited by corporate media and government spokesmen, because that is likely where the truth lies. Some of the memes that are censored on social media, for example, have no reason to be censored, and the censoring itself becomes their "evidence" that it is misinformation. The official reason will likely be "against community standards," with little to no explanation of what rule was broken—if indeed any were actually broken. Those who can see what information is against the goals of these censors can easily infer what those goals are. In many cases, those involved in the NWO will outright tell us in books or on television what they plan to do.⁹

Whatever the government and corporate media tells you to believe, you can be pretty sure the exact opposite is true. When was the last time your government told you the truth about anything? As George Carlin said, "I have several rules I live by. My first rule is to never believe anything the government tells me."

So what does all this focus on relative truth, on worldly truth, have to do with the pursuit of Absolute Truth? EVERYTHING. Truth is truth, and if you are not interested in the truth of what’s transpiring right before your very eyes—if you dismiss it and remain willfully blind to it—don’t hold your breath waiting for a revelation of Absolute Truth.

Richard Rose used to talk about kids coming to him saying they wanted to know Absolute Truth, but who couldn’t "wipe their own noses" or see what’s happening right in front of them. These young kids did not yet know about spiritual laws, the workings of the mind, or the principle of doing simple things before doing grand things. The Law of Progression¹⁰ applies here. One needs to be able to recognize relative truth and reject the easy-to-spot lies before there can be a greater recognition. The false is subtracted in order to reveal what is more real. There is no other way, and the relative world is all we have to work with. True, everything in relative reality is ultimately false, illusory. But unless and until one has a direct personal experience of that truth, we must work with the materials at hand.

Richard Rose often said, "You don’t know anything until you know everything."¹¹ This applies to truth on all levels. On the relative level, what you don’t know about an issue or subject might completely overturn and negate what you think you already know. Blind belief in TV "news" and government proclamations is not a good strategy if one desires to know Self and Absolute Truth.

There is a hermetic axiom: "As above, so below. As within, so without." The mind operates on the principle of opposites—duality. Therefore, we must include both sides in order to rise above them. Looking at only one side of an issue—or worse, having a personal investment in that one side—will blind one to the greater reality that exists, and if done intentionally, can only be considered willful ignorance. We must look at all levels of truth and lies to develop a mind that can distinguish between them.

***

Rose used to give a talk entitled "The Lecture of Questions," which is a long list of self-inquiry questions a seeker might ask. In that spirit, here are a few more in the context of this article that are perhaps worth adding to the list in these times:

"Does investigating the relative truth of what’s going on in the world contribute to, and perhaps speed up, the search for a direct experience of Absolute Truth?"

"How prepared for a revelation of Absolute Truth is a person who believes without question what his TV tells him?"

"Can someone who is willfully ignorant of relative truth ever hope to discover Absolute Truth?"

"Be honest: Is there any real difference between what you consider you own opinions and beliefs about current events, and what your TV tells you to think and believe? Are you, perhaps, just blindly supporting the current thing¹² as dictated by the "news" and calling it your opinion?"

History has repeatedly shown that the more powerful the government, the worse it is for the common man. With great power comes great responsibility,¹³ but every government in the world has demonstrated it cannot and will not be responsible to those it is supposed to serve. Instead, it serves only itself and those who run the show. It will claim to make you suffer for the "greater good," or "for your safety," and end up causing starvation, depression or death—intentional or otherwise—at the expense of the general populations it attempts to control.

FACT: In the last few years, while the rest of us were locked down, fired, driven out of business, forced to wear toxic masks, dying alone, committing suicide, and generally being made as fearful and miserable as possible, the net worth of the trillionaires and billionaires increased tenfold, in the most blatant, criminal transfer of wealth from the common people to the controllers in modern history. The reality is that rather than serve the people, governments—driven by the greed and sociopathy of the psychopaths who run them—seek to literally make the lives of their people ever more wretched, and to, yes, kill as many of them as possible, or failing that, to shorten their lifespans as much as possible, to "thin the herds" of humanity.

But history itself cannot be trusted. The victors and controllers write history, and re-write it over and over again to their liking. Books are burned, intellectuals and dissidents murdered, knowledge buried and lost. Officially recorded events must always be questioned, especially if they are held up as inviolable "truth," and used to denounce alternative histories as "conspiracy theory." This is easily seen if one takes the time to study the true history of the planet. And once you see the falseness of one historical event, it throws all of history into question. As the saying goes, "If you think today’s news is fake, imagine how fake history must be." Truly, everything you have ever been taught or think you know or believe, is a lie.

Richard Rose used to ask everyone he met, "What do you know for sure?" How would you answer that question? Is what you think you know merely what you have been told by corporate media and government indoctrination camps (schools)? How much independent thinking and research have you done about what’s going on in the world? Are you truly interested in truth? How much time do you spend looking for truth "under every rock," as Rose advised, and down every rabbit hole?

Are you a believer, or are you a seeker of truth? Do you think you can hold onto the mass formation psychosis¹⁴—unintentional though it may be on your part—on the level of relative truth and still be a candidate for the revelation of Absolute Truth? Are you demonstrating an obsession with "Truth at all costs no matter what it turns out to be" in your daily life? Or are you only prepared to accept Truth if it fits into your established belief system? If it’s the latter, you’re dragging a ball-and-chain as you traverse your spiritual path. Truth will never fit itself into any belief system, no matter how widely accepted, revered, traditional or seemingly profound.

Well, that’s enough for now. There is much more to be revealed, but chances are you’re not ready for most of it. When you gather the curiosity and courage to go down the rabbit holes of relative, worldly truth, however, we can talk. But fair warning, the truth will shake you to the core, enrage you, twist your stomach into knots, give you cold sweats, and invade your sleep. If you really want truth, you must be willing to pay the price, and the price is not less than everything you ever thought you knew or believed.

Most of you reading this will probably choose to take refuge in your habitual worldviews and illusions, and perhaps continue to point with derision at the "conspiracy theorists" who say that things are not what they seem. But a few of you may be willing to take the red pill, to take the next step to Truth. It is for you this article was written. God bless you, and Godspeed you on your journey.

More on the NWO.¹⁵

~ Thanks to Ricky Cobb, who wrote this essay with Bart Marshall.

---

Footnotes: